The Fructose Myth Debunked 🍑 Fruit Does Not Make You Fat

>> YOUR LINK HERE: ___ http://youtube.com/watch?v=1Pw9EThYExo

Today I’m going to spend some time on the topic of Fructose, since a lot of people have been asking. I’ve noticed a major trend in aversion to fructose, and especially fruit, in the mainstream nutrition arena right now, mostly because of the influence of the keto diet these days on the masses, and all of the misinformation surrounding that diet coupled with the typical lack of critical thinking or common sense inherent in dogmatic thought movements. • Identifying added fructose as the prime cause of obesity is completely misleading to the public, as well as policy makers who are now trying to do things like adding taxes to certain foods, about the ‘truth of obesity’ in the case that causality remains unproven. Obesity is recognised to be a multiple-factor-related health problem( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9... ), in which lifestyle factors( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1... ), eating behaviour( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1... ) and socio-economic aspects( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2... ) all play a key role, and fructose intake may be just one among several factors involved in its prevalence. At present, there are reasons to believe that isolated reductions in added fructose-containing sugar intake, as recently investigated( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2... , https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2... ), will not lead to a decrease in obesity prevalence. • Fructose is considered by some authors to be the primary culprit for obesity. In this video, I’m aiming to look at evidence regarding both positive and negative effects of fructose and fructose-containing sugar sources on obesity, as described in recent peer-reviewed research papers. • Is Fructose Directly Related To The Obesity Epidemic? • The entire claim that fructose intake is the cause of the current obesity epidemic relied upon correlation data between HFCS intake and obesity in the USA. This has been debunked along several lines of evidence. • First, the correlation of HFCS and obesity data only happened in North America. In Europe, there was also an increase in obesity prevalence during the same period, but HFCS was not consumed to any significant amount. Moreover, the term HFCS often led individuals to believe that it had a very high fructose content. In fact, the relative proportion of fructose to glucose in HFCS 55 (55 % fructose; used in most soft drinks) and HFCS 42 (42 % fructose; mostly used in non-beverage applications) is not that different from sucrose (50:50 %)(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1... ), although absolute levels as analysed in drinks may vary. In this respect, free fructose content in sucrose-sweetened acid-containing beverages, such as colas, was found to be increased during storage due to acid-induced sucrose hydrolysis( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2... ). • And here’s something nobody will tell you. • Four large, and very thorough, cohort studies showed no relationship between moderate sugar intake and type 2 diabetes. • The question of whether the aforementioned effects are really caused by fructose can therefore not be answered by the observational data since these show associations, not causality. • A New York Times article in 2012 ( http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/27/bus... ) pointed out that, due to incorrect methodology, US sugar consumption in recent years has been overestimated by more than 20 %. Interestingly, the author implied that sugar consumption has not risen substantially since the 1980 s. In addition, data obtained from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, in 2005–2010(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2... ), concluded that total energy from added sugars remained rather constant, or even declined in some segments of the population, in recent years. Yet obesity continues to rise in these populations. • Causation Debunked. • fructose intolerance is fruit bad for weight loss insulin ketogenic diet • 3 human studies have found that, in humans, even in when consuming excessive amounts of fructose over the short term, NO CHANGE is observable in whole body or muscular insulin resistance in the subjects. • This suggests that the human body has a very large capacity for metabolic plasticity, and can adapt quickly to the intake of excess sugars over the short term. • Follow Me On Social Media: • Website: https://umzu.com/yt • Blog: https://blog.umzu.com/yt • Facebook: / umzuhealth • Instagram: / umzuhealth • Personal Instagram: / _christopherwalker • UMZU Products: • Shop For Supplements - https://umzu.com/supplements • Shop For Books - https://umzu.com/books • Use code YOUTUBE For 10% Off! • Thermo Diet: • Get The Thermo Diet Here: https://thermodiet.com/yt • Find Out If You Have Estrogen Dominance - • Estrogen Is Killing Men: How To Lower...

#############################

New on site