EMD Sales Inc v Carrera 2024
>> YOUR LINK HERE: ___ http://youtube.com/watch?v=3tjxabc4R2w
Docket No. 23-217 • Granted: June 17, 2024 • Argued: November 5, 2024 • Are employers seeking to invoke an FLSA exemption required to meet the preponderance of the evidence standard or a clear and convincing evidence standard? • This case asks for the Supreme Court to decide which standard of proof applies when an employer asserts an FLSA exemption as an affirmative defense from liability: preponderance of the evidence or clear and convincing evidence. • Petitioners, E.M.D. Sales, Inc., et al. (“E.M.D.”), argue that the clear and convincing evidence standard applies only in limited circumstances, not to mere monetary disputes between private parties. • Further, E.M.D. asserts that the risk of erroneous decision is equal between the parties. • Respondents Faustino Sanchez Carrera et al. (“Carrera”), argue that a clear and convincing evidence standard applies because the FLSA protects important interests. • Further, Carrera argues the clear and convincing evidence standard is necessary to allocate the unequal risks among employers and employees. The outcome of this case has serious implications for labor law. • • Facebook v. Amalgamated Bank (2024) $... • • Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn (2024) • • City and County of San Francisco v. E... • • Bufkin v. McDonough (2024) • • Velazquez v. Garland, Att'y Gen. (2024) • • NVIDIA Corp. v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder ... • • Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, Sec. of Homeland... • • Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn (2024) • • Delligatti v. United States (2024) • • E.M.D. Sales, Inc. v. Carrera (2024) • Join this channel to get access to perks: • / @electronsinc
#############################
