Youtor
LOT Polish Airlines Flight 16 ATC Recording
>> YOUR LINK HERE: ___ http://youtube.com/watch?v=AnLgYgye6Zs
Accident Description: • https://www.instagram.com/p/Cka-VoRpg... • Photos Archive: • https://x.com/aircrashdaily/status/15... • 𝗟𝗢𝗧 𝗣𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝗔𝗶𝗿𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝗙𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝟭𝟲 was a scheduled international passenger flight from Newark, New Jersey to Warsaw, Poland, operated by a Boeing 767-300ER (Reg. SP-LPC) on 𝗡𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝟭, 𝟮𝟬𝟭𝟭. • The plane departed Newark at 04:19. After takeoff, during the retraction of landing gear and flaps the hydraulic fluid from the center hydraulic system (C system) flew out, which consequently led to pressure drop in this system. After completion HYDRAULIC SYSTEM PRESSURE (C only) procedure contained in QRH and consultation with the Operator's MCC, the flight crew decided to continue the flight to Warsaw. The flight proceeded without significant distortions. Landing in Warsaw was to be carried out with the alternate landing gear extension system. • At 12:17, during approach to landing on Warsaw Chopin Airport the flight crew performed the procedure of the lading gear extension using the alternate landing gear extension system. However, after the anticipated time the landing gear was not extended. At 12:22 the crew reported to ATC inability to extend the landing gear and requested the Operator’s MCC assistance. Around 12:25 the flight crew declared EMERGENCY. After a series of unsuccessful attempts to extend the landing gear and due to low fuel quantity, the crew decided to carry out an emergency gear up landing. The plane touched down on Warsaw's Runway 33 at 13:39. All 231 people aboard escaped uninjured. During the landing the plane sustained substantial damage, which caused its withdrawal from service. • 𝗖𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲𝘀: • 1. Failure of the hydraulic hose connecting the hydraulic system on the right leg of the main landing gear with the center hydraulic system, which initiated the occurrence. • 2. Open C829 BAT BUS DISTR circuit breaker in the power supply circuit of the alternate landing gear extension system in the situation when the center hydraulic system was inoperative. • 3. The crew s failure to detect the open C829 circuit breaker during approach to landing, after detecting that the landing gear could not be extended with the alternate system. • 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗯𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗙𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀: • 1. Lack of guards protecting the circuit breakers on P6-1 panel against inadvertent mechanical opening; from 863 production line the guards have been mounted in the manufacturing process (SP-LPC was 659 production line). • 2. C829 location on panel P6-1 (extremely low position), impeding observation of its setting and favoring its inadvertent mechanical opening. • 3. Lack of effective procedures at the Operator s Operations Centre, which impeded specialist support for the crew. • 4. Operator s failure to incorporate Service Bulletin 767-32-0162.
#############################
