David Friedman is Not an Ancap

>> YOUR LINK HERE: ___ http://youtube.com/watch?v=DRA6rLvHARE

I explain the little-known truth that David Friedman is not an ancap, and he may not even be an anarchist. • Join this channel to get access to perks: • / @liquidzulu • Or donate on ko-fi: https://ko-fi.com/liquidzulu • The following video is a detailed exploration of economist and author David Friedman's political philosophy, with a focus on why he is not considered an anarcho-capitalist despite his reputation as a libertarian and his advocacy for anarchism. The video argues that Friedman's rejection of Austrian legal theory is a crucial factor in this regard. • In addition to delving into Friedman's views on Austrian legal theory, the video also examines his broader perspective on law and economics. It explains how Friedman's unique approach to these subjects has influenced his political thought and shaped his ideas about anarchism and libertarianism. • The video goes on to discuss Friedman's ideas about the role of government in society and the potential for a free market to replace many of the functions traditionally performed by the state. It also explores Friedman's views on the relationship between law and liberty, and how his understanding of this connection shapes his vision of a society without government. • Overall, the video presents a nuanced and in-depth look at David Friedman's political philosophy, with a particular focus on why he does not fit into the anarcho-capitalist tradition. It offers valuable insights for anyone interested in the intersection of law, economics, and political theory. • The video continues by examining the ways in which David Friedman's rejection of Austrian legal theory sets him apart from other anarcho-capitalists. It explains how the Austrian school of legal thought, with its emphasis on the spontaneous order of the market, is a key underpinning of the ancap philosophy. In contrast, Friedman's approach to law and economics is based on a more pragmatic, consequentialist framework. • The video also explores the implications of Friedman's rejection of Austrian legal theory for his broader political philosophy. It argues that his departure from this key tenet of anarcho-capitalism means that his vision of a society without government is fundamentally different from that of other ancaps. • In particular, the video discusses Friedman's proposal for a private law society, in which legal disputes would be resolved by private arbitration instead of government courts. It explains how this idea is rooted in Friedman's rejection of Austrian legal theory and his belief that the market can provide more efficient and fair solutions to legal problems than the state. • Finally, the video considers the implications of Friedman's ideas for the broader ancap movement. It argues that his rejection of Austrian legal theory, and his consequent divergence from other ancaps on key issues, means that he occupies a somewhat peripheral position within the ancap community. Despite this, the video contends that Friedman's contributions to the field of law and economics, and his influential ideas about anarchism and libertarianism, make him a crucial figure within the broader ancap tradition. • (do not trust the above description, it was written by ChatGPT) • Social media: • https://www.subscribestar.com/liquidzulu • / discord • https://liquidzulu.github.io/ • / liquidzulu • Crypto: • BTC - bc1q9qlp7mr74d59aw8aznzfwphaw8gquee6p7mstt • ETH - 0xe4Ff56c3c77348793E751618ABf8Cf979aDCa7EB • LTC - ltc1qys7pr0j2dkyy978h4yt2gj338yeg2r8sx589t0 • Music: https://pastebin.com/0yTcDjxa • [LICENSE INFORMATION: I do not consider intellectual property to be a valid form of property, therefore it would be unethical for me to enforce the attribution requirement of the CC license that this video should be licensed under. Furthermore, if I have made a mistake and licensed under the standard YouTube license please let me know and I will amend it]

#############################

New on site