Pennoyer v Neff 1877 Overview LSData Case Brief Video Summary

>> YOUR LINK HERE: ___ http://youtube.com/watch?v=S-p1-7o7Qbc

This case is about a disagreement over the ownership of a piece of land in Oregon. The plaintiff says they own it because of a government patent, while the defendant says they own it because of a sheriff's deed they got from a sale. The defendant got the deed because they had a court judgment against the plaintiff, but the plaintiff says that judgment isn't valid because they weren't notified of the case or presented in court. The court is reviewing the lower court's decision about the validity of the judgment. • The most relevant facts are that the judgment against the plaintiff was obtained without notifying them or bringing them to court. The court will decide whether the judgment is valid or not based on whether the plaintiff had the chance to respond to the claims against them, and whether the proper procedures were followed to obtain the judgment. • Pennoyer v. Neff (1877) • Supreme Court of the United States • 95 U.S. 714, 24 L. Ed. 565, SCDB 1877-123, 1877 U.S. LEXIS 2227 • Learn more about this case at https://www.lsd.law/briefs/view/penno... • --- • Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite. • Check out all of our case briefs: https://www.lsd.law/briefs • Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text. • Subscribe for new videos every week: https://www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_c...

#############################

New on site