Youtor
Proof ForAgainst God Who Shoulders The Burden
>> YOUR LINK HERE: ___ http://youtube.com/watch?v=WHgpLPi8Cco
/ sciencereason ... Proof - Who Shoulders The Burden? by • • / clutchology • Clutchology treats the burden of proof as a philosophical equivalent of a science experiment. It is a way of testing your (religious) beliefs. He embraces it, and hates to see so many people using it as a weapon. • The burden of proof is, in short: • 1) The arguments you use to justify your position. • 2) How that justifies your belief. • • --- • Please SUBSCRIBE to Science Reason: • • / ffreethinker • • / sciencetv • • / best0fscience • • / rationalhumanism • --- • It is only reasonable to have a burden equal to the reasons why you believe. As I think most atheists are atheists because of lack of theistic justification and not positive arguments against god's existence, our burden is to show theism as unconvincing. In other words, when a theist makes an argument, the atheist has to illustrate its flaws. • Our next burden is to then show why atheism is tenable from this 'neutral' state. You cannot simply show theism as unconvincing and claim atheism is. That is what confuses most theists. • Theists, who make a positive claim, have to present arguments in favour of gods existence and a separate argument explaining how those arguments justify belief. The greater the validity and number of these arguments, the less they have to rationalise how those arguments justify belief. • Atheists who present no arguments, rely on faith and assert it is rational will have a tough burden on their hands. • The only way to avoid a burden of proof is to admit your beliefs are not based on rationality. Then you can go free without justification, but don't expect intellectual respect for the belief either. It goes both ways. • .
#############################
