Youtor
Phantom Time Hypothesis Did 300 Years of History Never Happen
>> YOUR LINK HERE: ___ http://youtube.com/watch?v=j7CSeUAPT9Q
FULL VIDEO HERE • • Phantom Time Hypothesis: Did 300 Year... • The Phantom Time Hypothesis is a fascinating, albeit controversial, theory proposed by German historian Heribert Illig in 1991. According to Illig, a significant chunk of European history—roughly 297 years between AD 614 and AD 911—simply did not happen. This theory suggests that the early Middle Ages, often referred to as the Dark Ages, were fabricated and inserted into history by a conspiracy involving the Holy Roman Emperor Otto III, Pope Sylvester II, and possibly Byzantine Emperor Constantine VII. • The idea stems from a belief that these leaders sought to legitimize their reign by altering the calendar to place themselves at a significant point in history: the year 1000 AD, which was seen as a symbolic and auspicious date. Illig’s theory proposes that these rulers, along with other powerful figures, deliberately adjusted historical records and even the Gregorian calendar to fabricate this period. As a result, Illig argued that the year we think of as 2024, for example, is actually closer to 1727 because those nearly 300 years never took place. • Illig pointed to several pieces of evidence in support of this theory. One was the perceived lack of archaeological and historical records from the early Middle Ages. He also questioned the accuracy of the Julian and Gregorian calendars, claiming discrepancies in the way leap years were calculated. According to Illig, these gaps in the historical and archaeological record suggest that this period was largely a fabrication. • While this hypothesis has been widely debunked by historians and scholars, who point out that historical records, artifacts, and scientific dating methods like dendrochronology (tree-ring dating) strongly contradict it, the Phantom Time Hypothesis remains a captivating and provocative idea. It touches on our relationship with history and time itself, and it raises unsettling questions: What if the timeline we trust as our collective memory was manipulated? Could our sense of history be wrong? • The story of the Phantom Time Hypothesis is more than a wild conspiracy theory—it's a reminder of how fragile our understanding of the past can sometimes be, and how powerfully human beings can shape, distort, or reinterpret history to fit their own narratives.
#############################
