Epistemology of Disagreement A Short Intro
>> YOUR LINK HERE: ___ http://youtube.com/watch?v=nxFJCaPJNn0
The epistemology of disagreement, especially peer disagreement and its relevance to reasonable belief, has been a central question in social epistemology in recent years. Is it reasonable to hold on to your belief in the face of disagreement? Or is disagreement evidence that you need to revise your belief? Is reasonable disagreement possible? • Subscribe! / @letsgetlogical • 0:00 Introduction • 0:32 Epistemic peers • 0:52 The Restaurant Check Case (Christensen 2007) • 1:24 The Conciliatory View • 2:29 The Equal Weight View • 3:46 The Steadfast View • 4:20 The Climbers Case • Further Reading • Matheson, Jonathan, 2018, “The Epistemology of Disagreement,” 1000 Word Philosophy • https://1000wordphilosophy.com/2018/0... • Disagreement in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy • https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/di... • Christensen, David, 2007, “Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News,” Philosophical Review, 116: 187–218. • Feldman, Richard, “Epistemological Puzzles About Disagreement,” in Stephen Hetherington (ed.), Epistemology Futures. Oxford University Press (2006). • Tom Brady Photo Credit: All-Pro Reels, CC BY-SA 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/..., via Wikimedia Commons • Music: Perception from http://www.bensound.com/royalty-free-... • #reasonabledisagreement • #peerdisagreement • #epistemologyofdisagreement
#############################
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2d9e/d2d9e44ff260c06332c92263cf3925eb24e6be2e" alt=""