Fender vs Warwick sound comparison

>> YOUR LINK HERE: ___ http://youtube.com/watch?v=p3QTEMjVnZM

0:00 Fender both pups (slap) • 0:10 Warwick both pups (slap) • 0:19 Fender both pups (finger) • 0:28 Warwick both pups (finger) • 0:38 Fender front pups (slap) • 0:47 Warwick front pups (slap) • 0:56 Fender front pups (finger) • 1:06 Warwick front pups (finger) • 1:15 Fender rear pups (slap) • 1:24 Warwick rear pups (slap) • 1:34 Fender rear pups (finger) • 1:43 Warwick rear pups (finger) • • sound comparison of Fender Warwick • played all EQ flat, tone roll up (Fender) and flat EQ active preamp through (Warwick). • recorded with steinberg UR22, through zoom B3n ( Air+Room reverb) and no any effects added. • warwick sounds brighter and more solid, and also bonucy, because of its high string tension resulting from the 2-piece warwick bridge. • Fender has more warm tone, and good compression especially when slapping or played on front pups on the other hand. • Both basses have opposite tone option... • please let me know what you think below the comment! • 【Fender】 • Fender 75th anniversary commermorative Jazz bass • Ash/maple/rosewood • Custom Shop '60s Single-Coil Jazz Bass • 【Warwick】 • warwick corvette standard bubinga 1997 • (replaced MEC dynamic correction to MEC active 3-band) • Bubinga/wenge/wenge • MEC active singlecoil pups • MEC active 3-band preamp • zoom B3n • Steinberg UR22 • #fender #warwick

#############################

New on site