ReImaginging The Approach to Patients in Shock
>> YOUR LINK HERE: ___ http://youtube.com/watch?v=pzgvfpzs-n8
Critical care and emergency medicine expert Dr. Sarah Sarah Crager introduces a new way of thinking about shock and challenges the traditional categorization of shock into four types: distributive, cardiogenic, hypovolemic, and obstructive. She highlights the limitations of this classification system and emphasizes the importance of considering shock precipitants and shock physiology as distinct entities. • Dr. Crager introduces the tank pipes pump model as an alternative approach to understanding shock. While this model helps gather data using ultrasound, she cautions against returning to the same old categories and limited treatment options. Instead, she advocates for a paradigm shift in thinking about shock. • The key takeaway is that shock is not solely about hypotension but rather hypoperfusion. Blood pressure and tissue perfusion are not always closely linked, and microcirculatory dysfunction can have significant implications for patient outcomes independent of macrocirculatory parameters. Dr. Crager emphasizes the importance of considering tissue perfusion and microcirculation, rather than solely focusing on blood pressure and forward pressures. • She challenges the prevalent blood pressure obsession in medicine and suggests a shift towards understanding the role of backward pressures and external pressures, such as tissue hydrostatic pressure, in shock. By incorporating forward, backward, and external pressures, Dr. Crager proposes a new way of approaching shock as a perfusion pressure problem. • Dr. Crager concludes by discussing the practical application of this approach at the bedside, using a patient's circulatory system map and considering the patient's specific condition. She encourages healthcare professionals to reframe their understanding of shock and consider perfusion pressure as a holistic concept in order to improve patient care. • Overall, this YouTube video offers a thought-provoking perspective on shock and provides a foundation for further exploration and discussion in the field of critical care and emergency medicine. • • 00:00 Introduction to Reframing Shock • 00:42 The Problem with Traditional Shock Models • 01:20 The Disconnect Between Shock Precipitants and Shock Physiology • 02:52 The Limitations of Ultrasound in Shock Diagnosis • 03:31 The Inadequacy of Current Treatment Models • 04:19 The Need for a New Approach • 04:50 Understanding Shock as Hypoperfusion, Not Hypotension • 05:08 The Importance of Microcirculation in Shock • 07:03 The Misconception of Blood Pressure in Shock • 08:16 The Role of Forward, Backward, and External Pressures in Shock • 11:35 Applying the 3-Pressures Model to Patient Care • 13:21 Conclusion: The Impact of Reframing Shock
#############################
![](http://youtor.org/essay_main.png)