Youtor
Darth Dawkins refuted by Greg Bahnsen
>> YOUR LINK HERE: ___ http://youtube.com/watch?v=ugxDpk4D9gk
Edit 6/2: There is a nuance to Plantinga's view that I learned. Plantinga thinks you can run epistemically circular arguments as long as you don't have doubts about R. The quoted passage in WTCRL doesn't make that clear. I think he follows Alston on this. Alston and Plantinga are both externalists. The main problem is that the epistemically circular argument towards proving R is couched as a conditional, which mean you say something like, if I have R then I can show that I have R. For more details see http://www.iep.utm.edu/ep-circ/ • originals: • • Darth Dawkins: How to Destroy Atheists • • Darth Dawkins: How to Destroy Atheist...
#############################
