Baker v Carr EXPLAINED AP Gov Required Supreme Court Cases

>> YOUR LINK HERE: ___ http://youtube.com/watch?v=vBc-4aET6f8

GET FOLLOW-ALONG NOTEGUIDES for this video: https://bit.ly/3XMSawp • AP HEIMLER REVIEW GUIDE (formerly known as the Ultimate Review Packet): • +AP Gov Heimler Review Guide: https://bit.ly/3rfXr2Y • Additional HEIMLER REVIEW GUIDES (formerly known as Ultimate Review Packet): • +AP US History: https://bit.ly/44p4pRL • +AP World History: https://bit.ly/46rfHH1 • +AP European History: https://bit.ly/3PCPyiw • +AP Essay CRAM Course (DBQ, LEQ, SAQ Help): https://bit.ly/3XuwaWN • HEIMLER’S HISTORY MERCH! / @heimlershistory • Tiktok: @steveheimler • Instagram: @heimlers_history • Heimler's History DISCORD Server: / discord • In this video Heimler walks you through another required Supreme Court case for the AP Government curriculum, namely, Baker v. Carr. This case was argued on the basis of the 14th amendment's equal protection clause. More than that, it established that the Supreme Court CAN rule on questions of legislative redistricting, or, in other words, questions of redistricting are indeed justiciable. • Additionally, Baker v. Carr laid the foundation for the one person, one vote principle, which was further established in later cases.

#############################

New on site