What is Theoretical assumption compare with critical theory Literaturenoteswithsasha
>> YOUR LINK HERE: ___ http://youtube.com/watch?v=-XgFDDILSwo
Theoretical Assumption and Critical Theory are two essential concepts in the realm of academic discourse, particularly in fields like philosophy, sociology, and political science. While both are integral to understanding and analyzing social phenomena, they differ in their purpose, scope, and approach. Let's break them down for your audience! • 1. What is a Theoretical Assumption? • A theoretical assumption is a fundamental idea or belief that is accepted without direct evidence, used as a starting point for constructing a theory or framework. These assumptions shape how researchers and scholars approach a subject, guiding their hypotheses and analysis. • Key Points: • A theoretical assumption is foundational and often unconscious. • It provides a base from which further theories are built. • They are often general, abstract ideas that frame the problem. • For example, in psychology, a common theoretical assumption is that human behavior can be understood through observation and scientific study. • In simpler terms, think of a theoretical assumption as a lens through which we view and understand a certain phenomenon. Without these assumptions, building a coherent theory would be challenging because we'd lack the initial framework for analysis. • 2. What is Critical Theory? • Critical Theory, on the other hand, is a philosophical approach that critiques and seeks to change society. It goes beyond understanding or describing social phenomena to challenge the power structures, ideologies, and norms that shape society. • Key Points: • Critical Theory is rooted in the works of thinkers like Karl Marx, Max Horkheimer, and Theodor Adorno, who believed that knowledge should be used to promote human liberation and social change. • It questions dominant ideologies and focuses on exposing inequalities within power structures. • Critical theorists believe that by understanding these inequalities, society can be transformed for the better. • Critical Theory goes beyond analysis; it actively seeks emancipation and social transformation by challenging mainstream views and oppressive systems. • 3. Comparison: Theoretical Assumption vs. Critical Theory • Let's break down how Theoretical Assumption and Critical Theory differ, and where they intersect: • Aspect Theoretical Assumption Critical Theory • Definition Fundamental beliefs or starting points for theory development. A framework that critiques societal power structures and ideologies. • Purpose To provide a foundation for further inquiry and theory building. To critique and challenge social structures and inequalities. • Focus Conceptual clarity, understanding of phenomena. Transformation of society through questioning and critique. • Nature Neutral or value-free (depending on the assumption). Emancipatory, often political in nature. • Goal Establish a theoretical framework for analysis. Questioning dominant ideologies, aiming for social change. • Example Human behavior is driven by biological instincts. Critique of capitalism and its role in social inequality. • 4. How They Relate: • While theoretical assumptions are often neutral, critical theory aims to challenge assumptions, particularly those embedded in social norms or power structures. For example: • A theoretical assumption might assume that education helps everyone equally. • A critical theory might critique this assumption, arguing that the education system disproportionately benefits certain classes, races, or genders. • 5. In Conclusion: • Theoretical assumptions lay the groundwork for how we think and develop theories about the world, often based on accepted ideas. • Critical theory, however, seeks to question and dismantle those very assumptions if they reinforce oppressive structures or ideologies. • . @Literaturenoteswithsasha
#############################