Moon hoax another blunder from David Percy Part 1
>> YOUR LINK HERE: ___ http://youtube.com/watch?v=jsDy0bs1Veg
In his desperation to cast doubt on the Apollo photographic record, moon hoax proponent David Percy has revived a ridiculous claim of the late unlamented Jack White - namely that a photographer's shadow in a down-sun photo should originate from the centre of the bottom edge of the photo. He thinks that the fact that astronauts' shadows are off-centre in Apollo photos is evidence that they were cropped and composited. It took me two minutes with a video camera to utterly debunk this moronic claim. • This claim is made at Percy's Aulis website: • http://www.aulis.com/composites.htm • The same claim has been made by Professor Colin Rourke of the University of Warwick in a published paper. Oh dear! You would have thought that a serious academic would have checked the facts before publishing such tripe. • In Part 2 I will deal with marks on the photos that Percy thinks are from a compositing process. Youtube user GoneToPlaid has already dealt with Percy's claims about doubled crosshairs in this video: • • Video
#############################